SHOOTING THE MESSENGER: The Curious Sex Crimes Case Against Wikileaks’ Julian Assange

https://i0.wp.com/s-ak.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/terminal01/2010/12/3/12/julian-assange-wanted-for-what-16671-1291398685-7.jpg?w=790

THE GLOBE & MAIL: At the centre of a tightening web of death threats, sex-crime accusations and high-level demands for a treason trial, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange threatened to unleash a “thermonuclear device” of completely unexpurgated government files if he is forced to appear before authorities. Mr. Assange, the 39-year-old Australian Internet activist whose online document-leaking service has embarrassed the United States and other countries by publishing hundreds of thousands of secret diplomatic and military documents, has referred to the huge, unfiltered document as his “insurance policy.” The 1.3-gigabyte file, distributed through file-sharing services this summer and protected with an unbreakable 256-bit encryption key, contains full versions of all the U.S. documents received by WikiLeaks to date – including those that have been withheld from publication or have had names and details removed in order to protect the lives of spies, sources and soldiers. MORE

THE GUARDIAN: Swedish prosecutors have sent an international arrest warrant to the Metropolitan police, seeking the extradition of Assange for https://i0.wp.com/farm6.static.flickr.com/5041/5217634178_1e329f5064_m.jpg?w=790questioning on allegations – which he strongly denies – of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion. [Wikileaks lawyer Mark] Stephens today denounced the extradition warrant as a “political stunt” and said Assange would fight deportation to Sweden on the grounds that it could lead to him being handed over to the US, where senior politicians have called for him to be executed. […] Stephens told BBC1’s Andrew Marr Show: “It is quite bizarre, because the chief prosecutor in Sweden dropped the entire case against him, saying there was absolutely nothing for him to find back in September, and then a few weeks later on – after the intervention of a Swedish politician – a new prosecutor, not in Stockholm where Julian and these women had been, but in Gothenburg, began a new case which has resulted in these warrants and the Interpol Red Notice being put out.” He added: “It does seem to be a political stunt.” MORE

CRIKEY.COM: The phenomena of social networking through the internet and mobile phones constrains Swedish authorities from augmenting the evidence against Assange because it would look even less credible in the face of tweets by Anna Ardin and SMS texts by Sofia Wilén boasting of their respective conquests after the “crimes”. In the case of Ardin it is clear that she has thrown a party in Assange’s honour at her flat after the “crime” and tweeted to her followers that she is with the “the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing!”. Go on the internet and see for yourself. That Ardin has sought unsuccessfully to delete these exculpatory tweets from the public record should be a matter of grave concern. That she has published on the internet a guide on how to get revenge on cheating boyfriends ever graver. The exact content of Wilén’s mobile phone texts is not yet known but their bragging and exculpatory character has been confirmed by Swedish prosecutors. Niether Wilén’s nor Ardin’s texts complain of rape. But then neither Arden nor Wilén complained to the police but rather “sought advice”, a technique in Sweden enabling citizens to avoid just punishment for making false complaints. They sought advice together, having collaborated and irrevocably tainted each other’s evidence beforehand. Their SMS texts to each other show a plan to contact the Swedish newspaper Expressen beforehand in order to maximise the damage to Assange. MORE

NEW YORK TIMES: The Internet group Anonymous, which in the past has taken on targets as diverse as the Church of Scientology and Iran, https://i0.wp.com/farm6.static.flickr.com/5041/5217634178_1e329f5064_m.jpg?w=790disseminated a seven-point manifesto via Twitter and other social networking sites pledging to “kick back for Julian.” Gregg Housh, a prominent member of the group, said by telephone from Boston that an orchestrated effort was under way to attack companies that have refused to support WikiLeaks and to post multiple copies of the leaked material. The Anonymous manifesto singled out PayPal, which cut off ties with WikiLeaks for “a violation” of its policy on promoting illegal activities, a company statement said. “The reason is amazingly simple,” Mr. Housh said of the campaign. “We all believe that information should be free, and the Internet should be free.” By late Sunday, there were at least 208 WikiLeaks mirror sites up and running. “Cut us down,” said a message on the WikiLeaks Twitter feed on Sunday, “and the stronger we become.” MORE

PC WORLD: WikiLeaks has asked the Web community to open mirror sites so it cannot be downed or censored and said Monday that 355 new sites are already up. “Wikileaks is currently under heavy attack,” the group said on its website. “In order to make it impossible to ever fully remove Wikileaks from the Internet, we need your help.” MORE

RELATED: In other cables released by Wikileaks on Sunday: Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, while prime minister, allegedly said at a lunch with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the West should be prepared to use force against China “if everything goes wrong” MORE

RELATED: If you would like to redistribute this article please respect FT.com’s ts&cs and copyright policy which allow you to: share links; copy content https://i0.wp.com/farm6.static.flickr.com/5041/5217634178_1e329f5064_m.jpg?w=790for personal use; & redistribute limited FT content. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. Britain and the US have condemned the decision by WikiLeaks to publish a secret list of facilities that Washington considers vital to national security, suggesting such a move could be of assistance to terrorist groups. In the latest secret US State Department cables published by WikiLeaks, the website reveals a detailed list of worldwide installations, including hundreds of pipelines, undersea cables and factories, that would cause most damage to US interests if destroyed. MORE

RELATED: Talking about WikiLeaks on Facebook or Twitter could endanger your job prospects, a State Department official warned students at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs this week. An email from SIPA’s Office of Career Services went out Tuesday afternoon with a caution from the official, an alumnus of the school. Students who will be applying for jobs in the federal government could jeopardize their prospects by posting links to WikiLeaks online, or even by discussing the leaked documents on social networking sites, the official was quoted as saying. MORE

THE ATLANTIC: Wikileaks is a powerful new way for reporters and human rights advocates to leverage global information technology systems to break the heavy veil of government and corporate secrecy that is slowly suffocating the American press. The likely arrest of Assange in Britain on dubious Swedish sex crimes charges has nothing to do with the importance of the system he has built, and which the US government seems intent on destroying with tactics more appropriate to the Communist Party of China — pressuring Amazon to throw the site off their servers, and, one imagines by launching the powerful DDOS attacks that threatened to stop visitors from reading the pilfered cables. In a memorandum entitled “Transparency and Open https://i0.wp.com/farm6.static.flickr.com/5041/5217634178_1e329f5064_m.jpg?w=790Government” addressed to the heads of Federal departments and agencies and posted on WhiteHouse.gov, President Obama instructed that “Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing.” The Administration would be wise to heed his words — and to remember how badly the vindictive prosecution of Daniel Ellsberg ended for the Nixon Administration. And American reporters, Pulitzer Prizes and all, should be ashamed for joining in the outraged chorus that defends a burgeoning secret world whose existence is a threat to democracy. MORE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *