O BRUTHA: Obama’s U-Turn On Habeas Corpus


SALON: So [candidate] Barack Obama — the one trying to convince Democrats to make him their nominee and then their President — said that abducting people and imprisoning them without charges was (a) un-American; (b) tyrannical; (c) unnecessary to fight Terrorism; (d) a potent means for stoking anti-Americanism and fueling Terrorism; (e) a means of endangering captured American troops, Americans traveling abroad and Americans generally; and (f) a violent betrayal of core, centuries-old Western principles of justice.  But today’s Barack Obama, safely ensconced in the White House, fights tooth and nail to preserve his power to do exactly that.I’m not searching for ways to criticize Obama.  I wish I could be writing paeans celebrating the restoration of the Constitution and the rule of law.  But these actions — these contradictions between what he said and what he is doing, the embrace of the very powers that caused so much anger towards Bush/Cheney — are so blatant, so transparent, so extreme, that the only way to avoid noticing them is to purposely shut your eyes as tightly as possible and resolve that you don’t want to see it, or that you’re so convinced of his intrinsic Goodness that you’ll just believe that even when it seems like he’s doing bad things, he must really be doing them for the Good.  If there was any unanimous progressive consensus over the last eight years, it was that the President does not have the power to kidnap people, ship them far away, and then imprison them indefinitely in a cage without due process.  Has that progressive consensus changed as of January 20, 2009?  I think we’re going to find out. MORE

RELATED: Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss ObamaFrown.jpg

EXPLAINER: What The Fuck Is Habeas Corpus?

RELATED: Habeas Corpus, The Lynchpin Of Freedom

RELATED: Obama Lets Us Down On Privacy, Pot And The Fourth Amendment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *