<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>banning contraception &#8211; PHAWKER.COM &#8211; Curated News, Gossip, Concert Reviews, Fearless Political Commentary, Interviews&#8230;.Plus, the Usual Sex, Drugs and Rock n&#039; Roll</title>
	<atom:link href="https://phawker.com/tag/banning-contraception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://phawker.com</link>
	<description>Curated News, Culture And Commentary.  Plus, the Usual Sex, Drugs and Rock n&#039; Roll</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>WORTH REPEATING: Why Santorum Still Sucks</title>
		<link>https://phawker.com/2012/01/05/worth-repeating-why-santorum-still-sucks/</link>
					<comments>https://phawker.com/2012/01/05/worth-repeating-why-santorum-still-sucks/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phawker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banning contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick santorum]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phawker.com/2012/01/05/worth-repeating-why-santorum-still-sucks/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[Artowrk by DONKEY HOTEY] THINK PROGRESS: Rick Santorum reiterated his belief that states should have the right to outlaw contraception during an interview with ABC News yesterday, saying, “The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that. It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to pass whatever statues they have.” Santorum has long opposed the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling “that invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception” and has also pledged to completely defund federal funding for contraception if elected president. As he told CaffeinatedThoughts.com [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><img decoding="async" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7002/6549179533_7a27dc9236_z.jpg" alt="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7002/6549179533_7a27dc9236_z.jpg" /></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline" id="internal-source-marker_0.724591225720421">[Artowrk by </span><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/donkeyhotey/6549179533/sizes/z/in/photostream/"><span style="font-size: 11px; font-family: Arial; color: #000099; background-color: transparent; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: underline; vertical-align: baseline">DONKEY HOTEY</span></a><span style="font-size: 11px; font-family: Arial; color: #000000; background-color: transparent; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline">]</span></p>
<p><strong>THINK PROGRESS: </strong>Rick Santorum <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/santorum-explains-06-loss-still-supports-state-right-to-outlaw-contraception/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">reiterated</a>  his belief that states should have the right to outlaw contraception  during an interview with ABC News yesterday, saying, “The state has a  right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to  do that. It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to  pass whatever statues they have.” Santorum has long opposed the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling “that  invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception” and has also <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/10/19/348007/rick-santorum-pledges-to-defund-contraception-its-not-okay-its-a-license-to-do-things/">pledged to completely defund</a>  federal funding for contraception if elected president. As he told  CaffeinatedThoughts.com editor Shane Vander Hart in October, “One of the  things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is  I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” the former  Pennsylvania senator explained. “It’s not okay. It’s a license to do  things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to  be.”<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/01/03/396516/santorum-states-should-have-the-right-to-outlaw-birth-control/" title="asdfasdf" target="_blank"> MORE</a></p>
<p><strong>RELATED:</strong> The effort to repeal President Obama’s health care legislation, he said,  is about whether the government can permanently get “their hooks” into  people’s lives. “It’s an issue about whether we are going to be a free people or not,” he told the crowd of about 150 people. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/us/politics/santorum-courts-romney-territory-in-new-hampshire.html?_r=1&amp;nl=us&amp;emc=politicsemailema1" title="asdfasdfas" target="_blank">MORE</a></p>
<p><strong>RELATED: </strong>Behind the sweater vests, the faith and family, and the self-definition  as a congressional reformer lies another Rick Santorum. This Rick  <strong>Santorum favors big business, curries favor from lobbyists, and helped  to bind the Washington influence industry to the Republican Party while  serving in Congress.</strong> Beginning in 2001, after Republicans seized  control of Congress and the White House, then-Sen. Santorum (R-Pa.)  began hosting Tuesday morning meetings with a select group of lobbyists.  These meetings were part of a larger plan &#8212; originally launched in the  1990s by Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), conservative activist Grover  Norquist and others when the GOP retook the House of Representatives  after 40 years of Democratic control &#8212; to pressure lobbying firms and  trade associations to dump their Democratic lobbyists and replace them  with Republicans. Named after the Washington business corridor famous  for housing lobbying firms, the K Street Project was aimed at installing  a permanent Republican majority in Washington. <a href="http://link.huffingtonpost.com/bf4j.efv/TwYuNEOdNUwJoDmBBe47d" target="_blank">MORE</a></p>
<p><strong>MORE: </strong>[Santorum] is a Catholic, and while many of his more socially  conservative positions have endeared him to the evangelical community,  they actually conflict with the teachings of his own church&#8230;<strong>Santorum has been one of the most prominent congressional defenders of intelligent design and the teaching of creationism</strong>.  But the Catholic Church has long been supportive of evolution. In 1950,  Pope Pius XII declared that there is no conflict between the Catholic  faith and the scientific study of evolution, and Pope John Paul II went  further in 1996, stating that science had produced an enormous body of  persuasive evidence in favor of evolution&#8230;In addition to evolution,  Santorum has broken with both the Church and scientists on the issue of  climate change. Santorum is a staunch climate change denier, declaring  climate change a &#8216;scheme&#8217; of the &#8216;left&#8217; that serves as &#8216;an excuse for  more government control of your life.&#8217; <a href="http://link.huffingtonpost.com/bf4j.efv/TwYuNEOdNUwJoDmCB144e" target="_blank">MORE</a></p>
<p><strong>MORE:</strong> Rick Santorum today rejected the argument that Osama bin Laden&#8217;s death  was a direct result of President Obama&#8217;s leadership. Instead, Santorum  argued, George W. Bush got the ball down court, evaded a double team and  tossed it up for his wide open successor. &#8220;The Obama administration has  been an abject failure on every front on foreign policy when it comes  to problems that have come up on his watch,&#8221; he said during a campaign  stop. &#8220;<strong>And of course he would say, &#8216;Oh, we got bin  Laden&#8217;&#8230;Getting bin Laden was a continuation of policy that was set by  the Bush administration</strong>. All he did, and I give him credit,  after being pressured for a long time, in which he held off on all the  reports, he finally conceded to go after him. And I think it was the  right move&#8230;But that wasn&#8217;t a strategic decision.&#8221;  <a href="http://link.huffingtonpost.com/bf4j.efv/TwYuNEOdNUwJoDmIBcc14" target="_blank">MORE</a></p>
<p><strong>RELATED:</strong> <a href="http://spreadingsantorum.com/" title="asdfasdf" target="_blank"><span class="st"><em>Santorum</em> 1. The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex. 2. Senator Rick <em>Santorum</em>.</span></a></p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JrjOLKRi7wg" frameborder="0" height="315" width="520"></iframe></p>
<p>Incredibly, this is completely absurd and totally accurate. To quote the Wicked Witch: Oh, what a world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://phawker.com/2012/01/05/worth-repeating-why-santorum-still-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
