Media Matters To NY Times’ David Brooks: What Part of SANTORUM SUCKS COCK IN HELL Don’t You Understand?

by: PhawkerPosted on:

Now that we have your attention, what Media Matters actually said was:

NY Times‘ Brooks lauded Santorum’s anti-poverty work, ignored his charity-related controversies:

Summary: In a recent column, David Brooks wrote that if Sen.santorum_thumb.png Rick Santorum loses his Pennsylvania Senate seat, it’s “probably good news in Pennsylvania’s bobo suburbs” but “certainly bad for poor people around the world.” Brooks, however, did not mention the controversy surrounding Santorum’s own charity, or his attacks on prominent international humanitarian groups.

Media Matters: Making Media Matter Since A Coupla Years Ago
Attytood: Bono Is Wrong-O, Seriously Santorum Sucks You-Know-What In H-E-Double-Toothpick